5 Costly MES Integration Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)
- Authentise Team
- Feb 4
- 3 min read
5 Costly MES Integration Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)
For many manufacturers, integrating a new Manufacturing Execution System (MES) into existing system architecture feels like an overwhelming task. While traditional MES has long ensured streamlined operations, the rise of additive manufacturing (AM) introduces unique variables - like complex geometries and dynamic scheduling - that legacy systems simply weren't built to handle.
The gap between a "successful" and "failed" integration often comes down to a few common pitfalls. Here are the 5 most costly MES integration mistakes and the 2026 roadmap to avoid them.
1. Falling Into the "Data Silo" Trap
Many legacy systems were not built with modern digital manufacturing in mind, making it difficult to connect data across platforms. If your MES cannot communicate with your ERP, PLM, or IoT platforms, you create "islands of information".
The Fix: Choose an API-first architecture. Authentise’s API-driven MES layers on top of your current setup, allowing data to flow seamlessly between platforms instead of requiring a total infrastructure overhaul.
2. Over-Customising Instead of Scaling
Standard MES solutions often require significant manual customisation to align with specific AM processes. This makes the system rigid and difficult to update.
The Fix: Look for modular customisation. Use a system designed with flexible workflows and AI-driven analytics that can be tailored to your unique requirements without breaking the core software.
3. Ignoring Real-Time Synchronization
A fragmented IT infrastructure leads to delays in data sharing. In a high-stakes production environment, waiting even 10 minutes for a status update can result in scrap or missed deadlines.
The Fix: Prioritise Digital Thread connectivity. Authentise enables continuous live tracking of machine utilisation and material consumption, keeping every stakeholder in sync in real-time.
4. Underestimating the Learning Curve
An MES is only as effective as the people using it. Employees accustomed to traditional workflows often face a steep learning curve when transitioning to a digital MES.
The Fix: Prioritise User-Friendly Interfaces and change management. Successful integration requires dedicated workforce training to ensure the transition from legacy systems to a new MES is smooth and maintains business continuity.
5. Failing to Automate Manual Handoffs
Manual data entry and paper-based process handoffs are the leading causes of bottlenecks. If your "integrated" MES still requires manual input for quoting or material tracking, it isn't truly integrated.
The Fix: Leverage AI and Automation. Authentise uses automation tools to eliminate these bottlenecks, offering features like automatic quoting and predictive maintenance for printers.
Your 2026 Integration Roadmap
To ensure your Additive Manufacturing MES delivers the best results, follow these critical steps:
Assess Gaps: Identify where manual intervention currently slows production.
Choose AM-Native Providers: Traditional MES may not support the complexity of AM workflows.
Plan Data Migration: Use data mapping and API testing to prevent data loss during the transition.
Continuous Optimisation: Integration is not a one-time event; gather feedback and optimise workflows regularly.
Future-Proof Your Operations
In 2026, businesses that fail to embrace digital integration risk falling behind. By avoiding these 5 mistakes and selecting a flexible, interoperable partner, you can unlock higher efficiency and lower costs.
Ready to streamline your workflow without the headache? Authentise makes MES integration effortless for startups and global enterprises alike.
Comments