Material Management in Additive Manufacturing: What ‘Good’ Actually Looks Like
- Authentise Team
- Feb 8
- 3 min read
Updated: Dec 5
Why Material Management Still Holds AM Back
Material is one of the most influential variables in additive manufacturing. Powder quality determines:
density
surface finish
mechanical integrity
porosity
fatigue life
Yet most organisations still track materials using spreadsheets, labels, and manual logs. That system worked when AM meant “one machine in an R&D lab.” It collapses the moment you scale to:
multiple machines
multiple sites
external labs
aerospace or medical audits
This article explains what good material management actually looks like, and how you can build a complete genealogy from powder to finished part.
For background, see also: Future of Material Management
The Hidden Cost of Poor Material Management
Most AM teams underestimate how much waste, rework, and risk is caused by weak tracking.
H3: Common issues include:
Losing track of re-use cycles
Using powder beyond allowable thresholds
Mixing blends without documentation
Failing audits due to missing records
Materials expiring unnoticed
No link between material batch and final geometry
Inconsistent consumables usage
Incorrect withdrawal amounts
Stock levels constantly inaccurate
Small errors create big consequences.
In highly regulated sectors, a single missing batch certificate can invalidate an entire production run.
What ‘Good’ Material Management Looks Like
If you walked into an aerospace-grade AM facility with strong traceability, you’d see the following:
1. A Single Source of Truth for All Materials
Instead of spreadsheets, everything is managed in a unified system:
batch IDs
supplier details
certifications
expiry dates
storage conditions
re-use counts
chain of custody
stock location
Every action is traceable - no guesswork.
See also: Additive MES Explained
2. Automated Tracking of Re-Use Cycles
Metal AM relies heavily on powder re-use. Without accurate tracking, unexpected porosity or mechanical failures appear.
A mature system handles:
sieving events
blending
lifecycle limits
automatic warnings
withdrawal and return logging
contamination prevention
3. Full Material Genealogy
This is the backbone of good material management. A closed-loop genealogy connects:
powder batch → build → machine data → operator → post-processing → tests → certification
This is the core theme behind: Smart, Traceable, Efficient
4. Integration With Workflow, Machines, and Quoting Tools
Material data should flow automatically into:
build travellers
scheduling
costing
quoting
MES workflows
reporting
This level of interoperability was demonstrated in: 3D Spark / Digifabster / Paperless Parts Integrations
This prevents teams from printing with the wrong batch or miscalculating inventory.
5. Real-Time Visibility of Stock Levels
This includes:
powders
filaments
resins
gases
supports
consumables
“Do we have enough material to start this build?” should always have an instant answer.
Why Material Management Is Becoming a Certification Requirement
In aerospace and defence programmes - such as the UK’s DECSAM initiative - material genealogy is becoming a central requirement for qualification.
See also: DECSAM Programme
Auditors expect:
complete traceability
documented re-use policies
batch-to-part linkage
evidence of controlled handling
Without robust material management, organisations cannot scale AM production for regulated environments.
The Impact of Good Material Management on Quality
Better Predictability
Consistent material handling means predictable builds.
Reduced Scrap
Re-use cycles are controlled, not guessed.
Faster Root Cause Analysis
When failures occur, you can see:
exact batch
exact re-use count
exact processing steps
Higher Certification Confidence
You can prove every step of the part’s history.
How to Implement Effective Material Management
Organisations typically progress through four maturity stages.
Stage 1 — Manual Tracking
Spreadsheets + shared drives. Works… until it doesn’t.
Stage 2 — Partial Systemisation
Some scanning, some internal tools. Better, but still inconsistent.
Stage 3 — Connected Toolchain
Workflow, machines, materials, and testing linked together.
Stage 4 — Full Digital Thread
Every material-related action permanently tied to the part’s lifecycle.
This is the foundation for large-scale manufacturing.
Conclusion — Material Management Is the Foundation of Good Additive Manufacturing
Machines can’t fix poor material control. Even the best-built part will fail if built on bad powder.
That’s why the organisations scaling AM fastest aren’t just buying better hardware — they’re building better material governance.
The payoff is huge:
higher reliability
stronger compliance
lower waste
faster certification
predictable production
Recommended Authentise Tools
Materials Management — track batches, re-use cycles, stock levels
Authentise Flows — connect material data to workflow
Authentise Threads — link material genealogy to testing
Digital Design Warehouse — maintain secure versions of build files
Want to Bring Order to Your AM Material Process?
See how leading manufacturers automate material genealogy across entire programmes. Book a demo

Comments