What Is Additive Manufacturing - And Why It Changes How Production Is Managed
- Authentise Team
- 5 days ago
- 3 min read
Additive manufacturing (AM) is often explained as a production method.
But in practice, it’s much more than that.
Additive manufacturing fundamentally changes how work flows, how data is handled, and how production is controlled - especially as organisations move from prototyping into repeatable, auditable output.
Understanding what AM really is means understanding why traditional manufacturing systems often struggle to support it.
What Is Additive Manufacturing?
At its simplest, additive manufacturing is the process of creating parts layer by layer from a digital design - rather than removing material from a solid block (subtractive manufacturing).
That definition is technically accurate, but operationally incomplete.
What truly defines additive manufacturing is that:
Production starts with a digital file, not a machine
Design, process, material, and execution are tightly coupled
Small changes upstream can significantly impact outcomes downstream
This digital-first nature is what gives AM its flexibility - and what introduces new complexity.

Why Additive Manufacturing Is Fundamentally Different
Traditional manufacturing workflows evolved around machines.
Additive manufacturing workflows evolve around data.
In AM, production depends on:
Design intent and revision control
Process parameters and machine behaviour
Material history and reuse rules
Execution decisions made in real time
Each build becomes a combination of digital decisions, not just physical actions. That makes AM incredibly powerful - but also harder to manage as volume, regulation, or repeatability requirements increase.
From Prototyping to Production: Where Reality Sets In
Many teams first encounter AM in low-risk environments:
Prototypes
One-off tools
Experimental components
At this stage, informal workflows often work.
But as AM moves into:
Serial production
Regulated industries
Long-lifecycle parts
those informal processes start to break down.
Spreadsheets appear. Email approvals multiply. Material records fragment. Reproducing a part six months later becomes uncertain - let alone six years later.
This is where additive manufacturing stops being a “printing problem” and becomes a workflow and execution problem.
Why AM Demands a Different Approach to Workflow
Additive manufacturing doesn’t fit neatly into legacy manufacturing systems.
That’s because:
Jobs don’t follow a single linear path
Machines behave differently under similar conditions
Materials are reused, blended, and aged
Production intent matters as much as production output
Managing this complexity requires more than job tracking. It requires Additive Manufacturing Workflow Software that understands how AM actually works - not how manufacturing worked twenty years ago.
The Role of Execution and Control in AM
As AM scales, execution becomes critical.
Teams need to know:
Which design revision was approved
Which material batch was loaded
Which parameters were applied
Whether the process can be repeated confidently
This is where Additive Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) start to matter - not as overhead, but as infrastructure.
Without execution control, additive manufacturing remains fragile. With it, AM becomes reliable, repeatable production.
AM Is a Production Strategy, Not Just a Technology
Additive manufacturing isn’t “new manufacturing”.
It’s different manufacturing - one that reshapes workflows, responsibilities, and expectations across engineering, operations, and quality teams.
Understanding AM properly means recognising that success isn’t just about printing parts - it’s about managing the digital thread that makes those parts trustworthy over time.
If you’re evaluating how to support additive manufacturing beyond early adoption, our post 8 Key Factors to Consider When Choosing Additive Manufacturing Workflow Software explores what production teams need to manage AM reliably, at scale, and for the long term.
Book a demo to see our Additive Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) in action.




Comments